Interview with Brian O'Mahony
October 11, 2006
(interviewed by Chris Tong)
O'Mahony has been a devotee of Adi Da for many years.
The one major lawsuit against Adidam was brought by Beverly
O'Mahony, Brian's wife at the time (1985). In this interview
with devotee Chris Tong, Brian speaks candidly about that
time, the lawsuit, the media circus that ensued, and what
to make of it all more than twenty years later.
Tong: There are several websites that make much of a
couple of lawsuits back in 1985, and the "media circus" that followed.
Now, in 2006, people interested in spiritual life discover Adi Da
(often via the web), read amazing things about Him, and start considering
the possibility of approaching Him as their Spiritual Master. But
then they run across these negative websites and hesitate in approaching
Adi Da or Adidam any closer. What would you say to these people?
O'Mahony: Recently I spoke to a very reputable Intellectual
Property attorney who has represented many religious organizations
in matters of copyright protection. She is intimately familiar with
the affairs of many well-known mainstream and alternative religious
organizations in America, and she is also a student of history.
I related to her the events of 1985 and the very negative impact
that they had on Adi Da's Work. She replied that "spiritual interventions"
are always met with a backlash. The greater the intervention, the
greater the backlash. A cursory look at history provides many examples.
She said also that there are always going to people who disagree,
misunderstand, become disaffected, and even attack what they once
held dear. And she warned me that the more Adidam grows, the stronger
the backlash will be, and the more the ranks of the disaffected
will grow. She admonished me and my friends to be strong, to remain
focused in our service to Adi Da's Spiritual Work, to expect backlash
and disaffection, and to not make the mistake of trying to overcome
it. Just tell the truth and serve our Master.
I found that
conversation very heartening. It reminded me that Adidam is not
unique by any means in being attacked. No matter how great Adi
Da's Work is, it is likely to always have its detractors and critics
and even some who are moved to attack it and try to destroy it.
considering Adi Da's Work, I say you are encountering the Truth,
and in Adi Da, the very Embodiment of Truth. His Work is a Great
Shining Beacon of hope and brightness and love in the midst of
this terrible world of suffering. The negative stories and accounts
you encounter on the Internet are simply not true. Some of the
stories have a basis in events that actually occurred, but they
present a distorted and false view of those events. Others are
simply made up, based on rumor, hearsay, and often passed on by
people who have never even met Adi Da or participated in His gathering
of devotees. For those who have participated in His Work, their
accounts are almost always based on a negative personal reaction
to Adi Da and His manner of Working, rather than on a right understanding
of the nature of His Work and its inherent and positive demand
to understand and transcend the ego and all its reactions. Or
they have reacted to the immaturity of the community of devotees,
which is a gathering of very ordinary human beings who have embraced
the Way but are certainly far from perfect.
There is something
in humanity that likes to tear down what is great. In my 34 years
as a devotee of Adi Da, I have seen that ugly motive in myself
on many occasions. I have seen it played out on the Internet by
many others, and collectively by the media. It is sobering and
disheartening, but it is a fact that we have to live with. My
suggestion to those who read negative comments about Adi Da is
to speak about them to a devotee, talk about what they bring up
in you, and be helped to move beyond the doubt that they engender.
Do not be distracted from the great Grace and Gift of Adi Da's
Offering to you and to all of humanity.
Other people running across these negative websites have discovered
Adi Da through His work in other areas, such as art or literature,
and may be interested in forming professional collaborations.
So their concerns, when they read about the lawsuits and the media
circus, are a little different. What might you say to them ?
On the occasion of the premier public exhibit of Adi Da's Divine
Image-Art in Los Angeles a few years ago, the gallery owner encountered
all of the negative content on the Internet. He was quite sanguine
about it all. He pointed out that almost everyone who has any
kind of fame has both supporters and detractors, and both sides
seem to use the Internet to promote their ideas. So, he was not
at all deterred in his collaboration with Adi Da and Adidam. The
exhibit was quite successful, and there was some media attention,
with the usual negative references to the past. But they were
not the point. The Art was the point. It was also interesting
to note the lack of energy for the negative content. A lot of
what is said on the Internet is simply rumor, gossip, and personal
opinion. Anyone can say whatever they like. People feed on the
constant "conversation" that occurs. On the other hand, media
professionals have to be much more responsible and cannot freely
quote hearsay, rumor, and invective. It has to have some verifiable
basis before it can be reported. Then they can have a field day.
But the lawsuits against Adidam were filed in the mid-'80s. For
the media, that is awfully old news if there isn't anything more
recent that they can build a story around.
So, what I
would say to professionals is that the old stories are simply
not true, that they happened a long time ago, and that they have
nothing to fear in terms of a repeat of the media circus that
happened in the mid 1980s.
The main concern spiritual seekers have when they run
across these websites is to know that what they are getting into
is not a "cult", and is the real thing, as "advertised". So when
they read the complaints listed in Beverly's lawsuit, or read
an article from a newspaper that quotes Beverly as saying she
was "compelled, over a prolonged period of time, to accept physical
and sexual abuses, confinement, degrading acts, inadequate diet
and the surrendering of her children" to Adi Da and other authorities
within Adidam, alarm bells tend to go off. They start thinking
"cult leader", "exploitation" of followers, all the things we
tend to associate with the word, "cult".
is that the lawsuit was dismissed by a judge, for lack of sufficient
legal basis —
that's one form of answer, a good one. But let's
get to the crux of the matter for such people: Was there any truth
to these complaints, particularly about Adi Da and Adidam? Would
Beverly have sued if there wasn't some truth to this? Some have
suggested this was a marital spat that got blown up way out of
proportion, a kind of "tempest in a teapot". Is there some truth
Yes, absolutely this was a marital spat that got blown way out
of proportion. And yes, the lawsuit was dismissed because it had
no merit or truth to it whatsoever, and was prepared by an attorney
who was later disbarred for unethical activities. So, what actually
and I broke up in 1984, about 8 months before the lawsuit was
filed. I was incredibly stupid, dense, insensitive, and selfish
in the manner in which I handled our break-up. We had been married
for 7 years, and our relationship was extraordinarily difficult.
We were both very volatile and strong-willed characters, we were
very different, and we were in constant conflict. We had gone
through two separations in the years before our final breakup
in 1984. Even though we loved each other, and had three small
children, our marriage simply could not sustain the constant struggle
and anger and real anguish we caused each other. We split up,
and I soon became involved with the woman whom I married a year
later and with whom I have had a wonderful intimacy for the last
22 years. Beverly was left single with the three kids. Even though
I did everything to stay involved with the kids and maintain my
support of them, there was no way to get around the fact that
Beverly and the kids were abandoned and alone, and I was happy.
That formed the heart-breaking emotional background to what developed
into a lawsuit in early 1985.
best way to answer the question about whether there was any truth
to what was in the lawsuit, would be to quote from a letter written
to me by my former spouse, Beverly, on February 4, 1997. The letter
was written in response to my asking Beverly if she could help
set the record straight about what actually occurred in 1985.
Beverly and I reconciled many years ago, and have continued to
stay in touch, mainly around our mutual love and service to our
three children, all now grown-up and leading happy and productive
lives in the world. Last year Beverly and my three kids and their
intimates joined my wife and I for Thanksgiving.
1997, I told Beverly that a Dutch magazine was writing an article
about Adi Da and His Work, and resurrecting all the old stuff
from the '80s, and I asked her if she would help us tell the truth
of what actually happened. She said that she would, and said "I
agree that 99% of what I have seen of any reporting on the Community/Guru
is horseshit". She went on to say:
has ever in my life forced me to have sex with anyone, including
Franklin Jones. I have always been completely monogamous, and
was never pressured, encouraged, coerced, etc. to have sex with
anyone but my husband when I was in the community.
think of anything the Master ever forced me to do. There were
times I was given an instruction which I considered spiritual
lessons at the time, which I attempted to follow. I was never
given a personal command or order that comes to mind.
physical contact I have ever had with Da is a few hugs, and
when I was very pregnant, he touched my belly in a gentle and
soothing way. That is it.
have never filed a lawsuit, or even thought of filing one, if
it weren't for Tony and Louie [Note: names have been changed
to protect actual identities, but these men were at the focal
point of the attacks on Adi Da and His Work in 1985.] They
came to me, and told me they had a lawyer, and they would take
care of everything. I was in a very vulnerable place (single
mother with three small children) and I let them take charge.
Had I known it would turn into the media circus it did, I wouldn't
have taken that route. I enjoy my privacy. Cunningham (the lawyer
whom Tony and Louie introduced to me) is the sleaziest, lowest
drunk you can imagine.
both TV and newspaper, distorted everything. I was interviewed
by a reporter for one of the S.F papers —
I can't remember if it was the Examiner or the Chronicle
and I couldn't believe it when I read the article. It had very
little to do with anything I said. It was at that point that
I lost faith in news, journalism, reporters, etc."
was very deliberately crafted to make Adi Da and Adidam look like
a typical destructive cult. It had no basis in fact. At Beverly's
formal deposition, which I attended, she told the truth and point-by-point
shredded the case that her attorney had built for her. Nevertheless,
her attorney convinced her to persist in the legal process and
the lawsuit was eventually settled out of court by our insurance
company, who preferred to pay the relatively small settlement
amount rather than pay for the expensive process of actually defending
the suit in court. Also, in a formal proceeding while the settlement
was still in process, the judge at the Marin Superior Court threw
out the case.
how disreputable was this attorney?
We went searching out on the web, and here's what we found.
Judge for yourself:
was forced off the State Bar of California in 2001 (when
he resigned in the face of misconduct allegations) [ref].
tried to file for Chapter 11 (on behalf of the "Cunningham
Family Trust") several times (unsuccessfully); and one
dismissal stated that "the Trust has made false statements
in papers filed with this Court" [ref]).
one point, he was discovered to have given a false address
for his supposed law business [ref].
the time of his death (4/24/06) [ref],
he was under investigation by the police for possible
fraud charges: "Police learned that Cunningham placed
a call to [a recently deceased friend's] lone next-of-kin
his elderly mother in Ohio —
and tried to persuade her to surrender control of the
family trust by misrepresenting himself as [his friend's]
I know it
might be hard for most people to believe that there is hardly
an ounce of truth to what was contained in that lawsuit. But that
is actually the case. It took an entirely disreputable attorney
to make it possible for such a lawsuit to be created. That such
a thing could happen strains credulity in most ordinary good-hearted
people. I remember my own feelings of helplessness and anguish
when I tried to defend myself and my Master and my friends against
the various allegations. It was a great relief to me and a measure
of restoration of my faith in the legal system when the judge
finally saw through Cunningham's efforts and summarily dismissed
Cunningham got a share of the settlement amount. His participation
was entirely cynical from the beginning. He approached me personally
at Adidam's offices several times during the legal process to
encourage me to settle the suit and "end this ugly affair". He
knew that there was no basis for a lawsuit, but he also knew that,
by playing the "destructive cult and cult leader" card, he could
get what he wanted. And he especially knew that by putting all
these accusations in a lawsuit, the media could repeat them without
fear of being charged with libel or slander. I think, however,
that even he was surprised at the magnitude of the media circus
To the surprise
of no one involved with the drama of that time, Mr Cunningham
was disbarred a few years later.
One of the things that is striking when we read the sensationalized
newspaper articles or listen to the Today Show, is how much you,
the "leaders" in Adidam, and Adi Da Himself, are "caricatured",
almost in a cartoon-like fashion, as faceless, feelingless "bad
guys", and how the media made out the people filing the lawsuits
to be the "victims", the ones deserving of the reader's or viewer's
sympathy. However, when I talked to Lynne Wagner, who was named
as one of the plaintiffs on the "Beverly O'Mahony" lawsuit, I
was struck, not only by hearing the other side of the story, but
in realizing that it hasn't really been told. She was shocked
by the lawsuit, at how the media had turned things like her recommendation
to Beverly to stay a week longer into, "Beverly was held against
her will", etc. Can you say a little bit about what the whole
period was like for you? I'm sure it must have been incredibly
difficult for you and everyone.
Well, I was personally devastated and in shock during the whole
time, and I felt absolutely terrible for Adi Da, for my friends
and intimates, and in particular for my children. I had never
been involved with the media before and I was astonished at the
"feeding frenzy" that occurred. I can honestly say that my former
wife, Beverly, was just as devastated. But the media phenomenon
took on a life of its own and actually drove a lot of the events
that occurred after the lawsuit was filed.
As is typical
in a situation like this, our attorneys advised us not to speak
to the media. However, we felt we had to defend ourselves and
get the truth out. So, we spoke to everyone. And the more we spoke,
the worse it seemed to get. After a few weeks, the Today Show
contacted us, told us that they wanted to do a balanced piece
on the story, and guaranteed that our side would be fully represented
in their piece. We were ecstatic. Finally, a national show, respected
for its balanced reporting, would tell the real story! We opened
the doors for them. I worked personally with the producer and
the main reporter. We gave them full access to everything and
everyone, even our children. We all gathered around the TV to
watch the show when it finally aired, full of anticipation. The
producer had called me the day before to tell me that he was very
happy with the piece and was sure I would be too.
Today Show was an absolute hit job! No one spoke for a long time
after we turned it off. It was obvious that the show had written
the story line before they even contacted us and they cherry-picked
all our comments and all our material to reinforce their script.
They went so far as to pick the weakest or most emotional comments
we had made and insert them in a way to make us look even worse.
Their storyline was "is this another Jonestown in the making?"
Sells a lot of advertising time, but unfortunately for us, had
nothing to do with the truth!
a lot about the world of journalism from that incident, and from
the other media involvement we had at the time. The media was
beholden to its audience, not to us, and not to the truth. It
is hard for ordinary people to imagine this. Most of us believe
what we see or read, especially when coming from mainstream media.
But that is actually naïve.
maelstrom was capped by another remarkable incident a few weeks
after the lawsuit was filed. The San Francisco Examiner,
which was the first major media outlet to break the original story,
asked if they could send a reporter to Adi Da Samrajashram, in
Fiji, to get the "real truth" and tell everyone the "real story".
Getting a bit wiser to what was going on, we agreed on one condition,
that we have final review of the story from the reporter before
it was published, so that we could rebut any falsehoods. The reporter
spent several days at Adi Da's Hermitage Island, and was accompanied
by a senior official from the U.S Embassy in Fiji. I was present
at the San Francisco Examiner's editor's side as the story
came over the wire from Fiji, on a Saturday night. It was slated
to run on the front page of the Sunday edition. As the editor
read the story, his mood turned from happy expectation of a unique
scoop to disappointment. He said, "There is nothing here. It is
a bloody travelogue." I read it and, despite the reporter's obvious
efforts to inject some controversy, it was actually a long account
of a perfectly benign and positive Island Hermitage of Adi Da,
of the devotees who lived there, and their families. The editor
relegated the story to the inside pages, and that was the end
because of the Internet, all of the other sensational versions
of what happened back then have been constantly regurgitated in
one form or another on various websites since that time, often
posted by the very people who attacked Adidam in the first place.
It goes on and on and it has a life of its own.
For me, it
is heartbreaking to feel how my own character failures surrounding
the ending of my previous marriage have contributed to a permanent
stain on Adi Da's Beautiful Work. He is not responsible for any
of this. All of the "egos in the growling pit" have written these
stories, and continue to do so. I can only hope and pray that
people will not buy the negativity and will find True Happiness
instead in His Perfect Company.
To close then . . . Do people considering the Way of Adidam
today in 2006 have anything to fear? Or maybe to put it another
way: They're fearing getting their money ripped off, and having
their sexuality compromised, when perhaps what they should be
"fearing" is the much bigger thing that Beloved Adi Da is after:
the complete rip-off of their "separate self" altogether!
What is it Franklin Roosevelt said?: "There is nothing to
fear but fear itself." Well, Adi Da has promised that all sense
of separate self will ultimately be transcended in the Way in
His Company. From an egoic point of view, that sounds scary. But
what He promises is Liberation from mortality, from the "little
self" and its limited, mortal point of view, so one can instead
Realize the Divine Being. That is actually an unbelievably happy
process rather than a fearful one, although it is difficult and
requires intense embrace of the Way in His Company.
It is important
to understand, however, that all participation with Adi Da and
His Way is voluntary and it is up to each individual as to how
intensely they participate or practice, and how quickly they grow
in the process.
I am a professional engineer, a partner in a successful consulting
engineering firm with offices in California and Fiji (yes!). We
have 28 employees. I have been very happily married for the past
21 years. I have a very positive and loving relationship with
my grown children, and with my mother and other relatives in Ireland.
I maintain all kinds of professional responsibilities in the world.
In other words, I am a very ordinary person. I am constantly drawn
to a simpler life, a life that will allow more and more time for
contemplation of my Master, Adi Da Samraj, and ultimately, full
and complete Liberation and Realization of Him. I have always
felt that if there is room for people like me in Adidam, there
is room for everyone!
Adi Da is always calling and urging us to deeper and more profound
embrace of the Way. Why wouldn't He? Our Liberation is His only
Purpose. So, I constantly feel the demand to deepen my practice,
to grow more, to contemplate my Master and His Work more seriously
and constantly. I am very grateful for this demand and for Adi
Da's Call to move beyond my otherwise mortal destiny.
But the process
is gradual. And everyone is different in their impulse. Some are
rather readily moved to a life of renunciation and intense practice.
Others, like me, move more slowly. Adi Da accounts for everyone
in His Work, and invites everyone's participation. That is why
He has offered different levels of involvement, and different
congregations depending on one's impulse. And yet the Way is instant
also. I felt instantly Liberated when I first read His Word, and
that feeling has never left me. I have always felt that He Enlightened
me in that very first moment, and my life is just the purification
and release of all obstructions that remain to my perfect enjoyment
of His Gift and His Divine Company.
is absolutely nothing to fear in becoming a devotee of Adi Da
Samraj. Much to transcend, much to embrace, much to practice with,
understand, and enjoy, but certainly nothing to fear. He is the
Bright Love-Bliss Radiance of Conscious Light, Illuminating and
Pervading all of us. Of this I am absolutely certain.